Clitheroe 2-2

City keeping up the entertainment factor. Thought we battered them second half and was disappointed we took our foot off the gas when we got it back to 2-2. Wonder if it's worth trying Gregson at centre midfield? He's always seemed very good with the ball at his feet and he would add some much needed height into the middle of the park if we're playing long ball football. We seem to be struggling getting all our three centre backs in the line up and centre mid has been a problem position this season so might be worth considering.

To say Clitheroe are 4th in the table, I thought today showed how much we've underperformed this season. Still 54 points to play for though and we've played most of the top teams home and away. Top 8 is a very realistic goal.

Attendance, only 189 with about 30/40 from Citheroe, remains a down point.

[b]Good performance didn't deserve to lose[b]

themaclad wrote:[b]Good performance didn't deserve to lose[b]

Don't forget the / before the second b!

Lose?

To say Clitheroe are fourth in the table also shows what a poor league this is this season. Yet ironically this is one point more than we gained against them last season when we had a stronger side. I thought Tom was outstanding this afternoon, and Greeny was on target again. I felt that moving Dodger from wide left to centre midfield didn't work, and am still unhappy with Ryan as a midfielder rather than left back. Very surprised that Danny was the defender omitted, and felt that we gave away both goals by non-existent marking. Agree though that we are playing more football than was the case a month or so ago, but it is still worrying that we have lost around 40% of our already small fan base.

LFC-LCFC wrote:

themaclad wrote:[b]Good performance didn't deserve to lose[b]

Don't forget the / before the second b!

Lose?

Well we didn't lose did we!!!!!!!!!!

Brocker wrote:To say Clitheroe are fourth in the table also shows what a poor league this is this season. Yet ironically this is one point more than we gained against them last season when we had a stronger side. I thought Tom was outstanding this afternoon, and Greeny was on target again. I felt that moving Dodger from wide left to centre midfield didn't work, and am still unhappy with Ryan as a midfielder rather than left back. Very surprised that Danny was the defender omitted, and felt that we gave away both goals by non-existent marking. Agree though that we are playing more football than was the case a month or so ago, but it is still worrying that we have lost around 40% of our already small fan base.

TH & PB fans will not be back for along time and finger wagging officials may drive away other long standing fans.

Do we all know that the marsh are playing on the axe next season!

Its been said they are to enter the west lancs and want to move up the leagues and may in the end have bigger crowds than City

Agree with Brocker poor marking for their goals, and we battered them second half. Crowd was disappointing, it Marsh are using Axe next year we need to charge good rent and a % of their gate!!!!

What about the pitch, if a North Lancs side are to use it?

Brocker wrote:What about the pitch, if a North Lancs side are to use it?

Dread to think...

its all gonna fold and we will be all be clitheroe ultras..lol....