Kenyon

cityuntilidie wrote:

Shakespeares_Theatre wrote:

Mad Cyril wrote:His spelling is fine, but he has failed with his grammar.

I am too busy to type you are when your suffices !

So what is this Kenyon like ,  are we going to be able to sell him for big money ?

If he has only signed a one year contract he will move on for free at the end of his contract.

Wrong. As he is under 24 a fee or compensation is payable.

Shakespeares_Theatre wrote:

Mad Cyril wrote:His spelling is fine, but he has failed with his grammar.

I am too busy to type you are when your suffices !

So what is this Kenyon like , are we going to be able to sell him for big money ?

Yes but "your" doesn't suffice does it? It doesn't make sense!!! You mean "you're".

I'll let you have that one for free, but in future I shall have to charge at agreed NUT rates.

Shakespeares_Theatre wrote:

cityuntilidie wrote:

Shakespeares_Theatre wrote:

Mad Cyril wrote:His spelling is fine, but he has failed with his grammar.

I am too busy to type you are when your suffices !

So what is this Kenyon like ,  are we going to be able to sell him for big money ?

If he has only signed a one year contract he will move on for free at the end of his contract.

Wrong.  As he is under 24 a fee or compensation is payable.

Did your lot have to pay Stockport compensation?

Hopefully he will turn out to be good enough to keep you just about 6-8 points of the relegation places, so hastening your descent into finacial oblivion. due to not being able to go into the much anticipated administration. If you aren't aware of this you will be the only person in the whole Bay area that isn't  

alasher wrote:

Shakespeares_Theatre wrote:

cityuntilidie wrote:

Shakespeares_Theatre wrote:

Mad Cyril wrote:His spelling is fine, but he has failed with his grammar.

I am too busy to type you are when your suffices !

So what is this Kenyon like ,  are we going to be able to sell him for big money ?

If he has only signed a one year contract he will move on for free at the end of his contract.

Wrong.  As he is under 24 a fee or compensation is payable.

Did your lot have to pay Stockport compensation?

Hopefully he will turn out to be good enough to keep you just about 6-8 points of the relegation places, so hastening your descent into finacial oblivion. due to not being able to go into the much anticipated administration. If you aren't aware of this you will be the only person in the whole Bay area that isn't  

I think we may have to pay Stockport £20k. Could be a good investment if he shines. We paid £50k for Carl Baker and sold him for £225,000. Jack Redshaw was free and his value is soaring.
You or at least I think it was you were predicting Administration about 4 months ago. Now I know you have much more personal knowledge of insolvent football clubs than most but .......................

7 figure debts make the world go round.

LFC-LCFC wrote:7 figure debts make the world go round.

God , another Lancaster brain surgeon who thinks he knows more about another club than anyone else !

Do you see any insolvency notices appearing in the London Gazette ?

Only fools and idiots wish such things on other clubs , its only a game you know. 

I wished nothing.

Just because one imagines something, it doesn't follow automatically that it is true. Maybe its the fact that someone is far too busy to use the correct grammar that leads them to fill the gaps in their knowledge with guesswork?